1985 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 183 more horse power than 1985 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1985 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 2012 Audi A6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Nissan Pulsar | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | Nissan | Audi |
Model | Pulsar | A6 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2911 mm |