1985 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1985 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1985 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Nissan Pulsar. 2012 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1985 Nissan Pulsar has manual transmission. 1985 Nissan Pulsar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Nissan Pulsar | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Nissan | Honda |
Model | Pulsar | CR-V |
Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 96 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2619 mm |