1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1965 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 50 kg more than 1965 Ford Zodiac.
Because 1965 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1965 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Ford |
Model | Cutlass | Zodiac |
Year Released | 1985 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2780 mm |