1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1967 AC Cobra
To start off, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 173 kg more than 1967 AC Cobra.
Because 1967 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1967 AC Cobra | |
Make | Oldsmobile | AC |
Model | Cutlass | Cobra |
Year Released | 1985 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 6997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 410 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1147 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2290 mm |