1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1973 Triumph 1500
To start off, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 1500 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 355 kg more than 1973 Triumph 1500.
Because 1973 Triumph 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Triumph 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1973 Triumph 1500 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Triumph |
| Model | Cutlass | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2460 mm |
