1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 66 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Toyota |
| Model | Cutlass | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1986 |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1104 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1910 mm |
