1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2006 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2006 Volvo XC90 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 118 kg more than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2006 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2006 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
| Model | Cutlass | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2922 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1438 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2720 mm |
