1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 89 kg more than 2008 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Volkswagen |
Model | Cutlass | Polo |
Year Released | 1985 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 54 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1231 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2470 mm |