1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 315 kg more than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2009 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Cadillac |
| Model | Cutlass | BLS |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1910 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2680 mm |
