1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2010 Cadillac SRX is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 596 kg more than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 Cadillac SRX | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Cadillac |
| Model | Cutlass | SRX |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1916 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4834 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2807 mm |
