1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Jaguar |
Model | Cutlass | XF |
Year Released | 1985 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2908 mm |