1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2012 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2012 Lotus Evora is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2012 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Lotus |
| Model | Cutlass | Evora |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 276 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4341 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1849 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2576 mm |
