1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2012 Toyota Sequoia

To start off, 2012 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1430 kg more than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Because 2012 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass 2012 Toyota Sequoia
Make Oldsmobile Toyota
Model Cutlass Sequoia
Year Released 1985 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2260 cc 5700 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 381 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type Front 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Vehicle Weight 1320 kg 2750 kg
Vehicle Length 4850 mm 5210 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 2029 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 3099 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]