1985 Opel Ascona vs. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (119 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1985 Opel Ascona. (74 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1985 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 385 kg more than 1985 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (181 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Opel Ascona. (101 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Opel Ascona | 2000 Daewoo Rezzo | |
Make | Opel | Daewoo |
Model | Ascona | Rezzo |
Year Released | 1985 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 48 L |