1985 Opel Kadett vs. 2012 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Opel Kadett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Opel Kadett would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Falcon (240 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1985 Opel Kadett. (75 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1985 Opel Kadett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Falcon weights approximately 790 kg more than 1985 Opel Kadett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Opel Kadett, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Falcon (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Opel Kadett. (101 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Opel Kadett. 2012 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1985 Opel Kadett has manual transmission. 1985 Opel Kadett will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Opel Kadett | 2012 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Opel | Ford |
Model | Kadett | Falcon |
Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 858 kg | 1648 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |