1985 Plymouth Reliant vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1985 Plymouth Reliant is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 710 kg more than 1985 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Plymouth Reliant | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Plymouth | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Reliant | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 5673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 164 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3690 mm |
