1985 Plymouth Reliant vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 598 kg more than 1985 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Plymouth Reliant | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Plymouth | Cadillac |
| Model | Reliant | CTS |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1748 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1842 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2880 mm |
