1985 Plymouth Sundance vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1985 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1985 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 30 kg more than 1985 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Plymouth Sundance | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
| Make | Plymouth | Holden |
| Model | Sundance | Apollo |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2610 mm |
