1985 Renault 18 vs. 2009 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2009 Ford Falcon is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Renault 18 would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Falcon (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1985 Renault 18. (63 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1985 Renault 18. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Falcon weights approximately 719 kg more than 1985 Renault 18. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Renault 18, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Falcon (391 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Renault 18. (103 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Renault 18. 2009 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1985 Renault 18 has manual transmission. 1985 Renault 18 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Renault 18 | 2009 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | 18 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1985 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1395 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 391 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 1704 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4955 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |