1985 Renault 25 vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1985 Renault 25 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,456 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Renault 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Renault 25 (205 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Renault 25 should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Renault 25 weights approximately 500 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Riley Kestrel (96 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Renault 25. (72 Nm). This means 1969 Riley Kestrel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Renault 25.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Renault 25 | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Renault | Riley |
| Model | 25 | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 2456 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 72 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2380 mm |
