1985 Renault 25 vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Renault 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Renault 25 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (212 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1985 Renault 25. (63 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1985 Renault 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 290 kg more than 1985 Renault 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Renault 25 | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Renault | Ford |
| Model | 25 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2068 cc | 4942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2580 mm |
