1985 Renault 25 vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Renault 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Renault 25 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1985 Renault 25. (63 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1985 Renault 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 822 kg more than 1985 Renault 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (340 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Renault 25. (129 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Renault 25.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Renault 25 | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Renault | Jaguar |
| Model | 25 | XF |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2068 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 335 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 129 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 21.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2002 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2053 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2909 mm |
