1985 Seat Ronda vs. 2003 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 480 kg more than 1985 Seat Ronda.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Seat Ronda | 2003 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | Seat | Chrysler |
Model | Ronda | Sebring |
Year Released | 1985 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1193 cc | 2425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2640 mm |