1985 Skoda L vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1985 Skoda L is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Triumph 2000 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1985 Skoda L. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1985 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 355 kg more than 1985 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Triumph 2000 (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Skoda L. (103 Nm @ 2850 RPM). This means 1972 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Skoda L | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Skoda | Triumph |
| Model | L | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1289 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2850 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
