1985 Skoda L vs. 2003 Toyota Echo
To start off, 2003 Toyota Echo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Echo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Echo (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1985 Skoda L. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Echo should accelerate faster than 1985 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Echo weights approximately 65 kg more than 1985 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Skoda L is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Skoda L. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Echo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Echo (142 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Skoda L. (103 Nm @ 2850 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota Echo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Skoda L. 2003 Toyota Echo has automatic transmission and 1985 Skoda L has manual transmission. 1985 Skoda L will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Toyota Echo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Skoda L | 2003 Toyota Echo | |
Make | Skoda | Toyota |
Model | L | Echo |
Year Released | 1985 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1289 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2850 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75.6 mm | 75.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 84.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2380 mm |