1985 Skoda Rapid R vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1985 Skoda Rapid R is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1985 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1985 Skoda Rapid R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1985 Skoda Rapid R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Skoda Rapid R. (99 Nm @ 2850 RPM). This means 1964 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Skoda Rapid R.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Skoda Rapid R | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Skoda | Triumph |
Model | Rapid R | 2000 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1289 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 99 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2850 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75.5 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 64 L |