1985 Suzuki Swift vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Suzuki Swift. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Suzuki Swift | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Suzuki | Jeep |
| Model | Swift | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 991 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 205 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3590 mm | 4161 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2103 mm |
