1985 Suzuki Swift vs. 2012 Ford Bantam
To start off, 2012 Ford Bantam is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 1,324 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Suzuki Swift is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Bantam (74 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1985 Suzuki Swift. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Bantam should accelerate faster than 1985 Suzuki Swift. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Bantam weights approximately 320 kg more than 1985 Suzuki Swift. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Bantam (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Suzuki Swift. (107 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Bantam will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Suzuki Swift | 2012 Ford Bantam | |
Make | Suzuki | Ford |
Model | Swift | Bantam |
Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 107 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3590 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1640 mm |