1985 Toyota Celica vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1985 Toyota Celica. (120 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1985 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 681 kg more than 1985 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Toyota Celica. (150 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Toyota Celica. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1985 Toyota Celica has manual transmission. 1985 Toyota Celica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Toyota Celica | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Toyota | Chevrolet |
| Model | Celica | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 98 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1781 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4771 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2857 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 71 L |
