1985 Toyota Cressida vs. 2006 Toyota Ractis
To start off, 2006 Toyota Ractis is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1985 Toyota Cressida is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Toyota Cressida. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Ractis, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Ractis (158 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Toyota Cressida. (157 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Ractis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Toyota Cressida. 2006 Toyota Ractis has automatic transmission and 1985 Toyota Cressida has manual transmission. 1985 Toyota Cressida will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Toyota Ractis will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Toyota Cressida | 2006 Toyota Ractis | |
| Make | Toyota | Toyota |
| Model | Cressida | Ractis |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1988 cc | 1299 cc |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
