1985 Volvo 780 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Volvo 780. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Volvo 780 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1985 Volvo 780. (127 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1985 Volvo 780. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 243 kg more than 1985 Volvo 780. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Volvo 780. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Volvo 780 (250 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Equinox. (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1985 Volvo 780 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Equinox. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1985 Volvo 780 has manual transmission. 1985 Volvo 780 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Volvo 780 | 2012 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Volvo | Chevrolet |
Model | 780 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2383 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1713 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2858 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.2 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.5 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 71 L |