1985 Zastava 750 vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1985 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1985 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 445 kg more than 1985 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1985 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Zastava 750. 2009 Mazda 3 has automatic transmission and 1985 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1985 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: