1985 Zastava 750 vs. 2010 Audi A6

To start off, 2010 Audi A6 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A6 (350 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 317 more horse power than 1985 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1985 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi A6 weights approximately 1270 kg more than 1985 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Audi A6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Zastava 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi A6 (440 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Zastava 750. 2010 Audi A6 has automatic transmission and 1985 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1985 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Audi A6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: