1985 Zastava 750 vs. 2010 Scion xB
To start off, 2010 Scion xB is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Scion xB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Scion xB (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1985 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Scion xB should accelerate faster than 1985 Zastava 750.
Because 1985 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Scion xB, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Scion xB (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Scion xB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Zastava 750 | 2010 Scion xB | |
| Make | Zastava | Scion |
| Model | 750 | xB |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 55 Nm | 219 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4249 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2601 mm |
