1986 AC Ace vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1986 AC Ace is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1986 AC Ace. (201 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1986 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 855 kg more than 1986 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 AC Ace is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 AC Ace will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 AC Ace | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Ace | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1986 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 40 L |