1986 AC Ace vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1986 AC Ace is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 AC Ace (150 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 263 kg more than 1986 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 AC Ace (214 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1986 AC Ace | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | AC | Triumph |
Model | Ace | 2000 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 214 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 907 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 64 L |