1986 AC Ace vs. 1967 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1986 AC Ace is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1986 AC Ace. (150 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1986 AC Ace.
Because 1986 AC Ace is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 AC Ace will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 AC Ace. (214 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1986 AC Ace | 1967 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Ace | Camaro |
Year Released | 1986 | 1967 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 4958 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 214 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 101.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 76.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2750 mm |