1986 AC Ace vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1986 AC Ace is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 AC Ace (201 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 AC Ace weights approximately 80 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 AC Ace (276 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1986 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 AC Ace | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Ace | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1986 | 1967 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 276 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 57 L |