1986 AC Ace vs. 1969 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1986 AC Ace is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1986 AC Ace. (150 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1986 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1273 kg more than 1986 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 AC Ace is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 AC Ace will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 AC Ace | 1969 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | AC | Cadillac |
| Model | Ace | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1969 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 907 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 79 L |
