1986 AC Ace vs. 1969 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1986 AC Ace is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1986 AC Ace. (201 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1986 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Mustang weights approximately 145 kg more than 1986 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 AC Ace is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 AC Ace will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 AC Ace | 1969 Ford Mustang | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Ace | Mustang |
Year Released | 1986 | 1969 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 4731 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 41 L |