1986 AC Ace vs. 1972 ZIL 114
To start off, 1986 AC Ace is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,959 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 ZIL 114 (296 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1986 AC Ace. (150 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 ZIL 114 should accelerate faster than 1986 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 ZIL 114 weights approximately 2268 kg more than 1986 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 AC Ace is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 ZIL 114. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 AC Ace will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 ZIL 114 (580 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 AC Ace. (214 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1986 AC Ace | 1972 ZIL 114 | |
Make | AC | ZIL |
Model | Ace | 114 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 6959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 214 Nm | 580 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 907 kg | 3175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3770 mm |