1986 AC Ace vs. 1980 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1986 AC Ace is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 AC Ace (150 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1980 Ford Falcon. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1980 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Ford Falcon weights approximately 463 kg more than 1986 AC Ace.
Because 1986 AC Ace is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 AC Ace will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Ford Falcon (228 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 AC Ace. (214 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1986 AC Ace | 1980 Ford Falcon | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Ace | Falcon |
Year Released | 1986 | 1980 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 3273 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 214 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 907 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2830 mm |