1986 AC Ace vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1986 AC Ace. (150 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1986 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 563 kg more than 1986 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 AC Ace. (214 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1986 AC Ace | 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ace | Sigma |
Year Released | 1986 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 214 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 907 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2730 mm |