1986 AC Ace vs. 2000 Ford TL-50

To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 AC Ace (150 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TL-50 weights approximately 395 kg more than 1986 AC Ace.

Because 1986 AC Ace is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TL-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 AC Ace will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 AC Ace. (214 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 AC Ace. 2000 Ford TL-50 has automatic transmission and 1986 AC Ace has manual transmission. 1986 AC Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford TL-50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: