1986 AC Ace vs. 2000 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1986 AC Ace. (150 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1986 AC Ace.
Because 1986 AC Ace is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Oldsmobile SS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 AC Ace will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 AC Ace. (214 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 AC Ace. 2000 Oldsmobile SS has automatic transmission and 1986 AC Ace has manual transmission. 1986 AC Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile SS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 AC Ace | 2000 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | AC | Oldsmobile |
Model | Ace | SS |
Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 214 Nm | 318 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1900 mm |