1986 AC Ace vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 AC Ace (150 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (104 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 416 kg more than 1986 AC Ace.
Because 1986 AC Ace is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 AC Ace will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 AC Ace (214 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (172 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1986 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1986 AC Ace | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Ace | Ranger |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 214 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 907 kg | 1323 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 80 L |