1986 AC Ace vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 AC Ace would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1986 AC Ace. (150 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1986 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1437 kg more than 1986 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 AC Ace. (214 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1986 AC Ace | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Ace | Armada |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 214 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 907 kg | 2344 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 106 L |