1986 AC Ace vs. 2005 Smart Coupe
To start off, 2005 Smart Coupe is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 AC Ace (150 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2005 Smart Coupe. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2005 Smart Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 AC Ace weights approximately 177 kg more than 2005 Smart Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 AC Ace (214 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Smart Coupe. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1986 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Smart Coupe. 2005 Smart Coupe has automatic transmission and 1986 AC Ace has manual transmission. 1986 AC Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Smart Coupe will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 AC Ace | 2005 Smart Coupe | |
| Make | AC | Smart |
| Model | Ace | Coupe |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 214 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 907 kg | 730 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 1820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 33 L |
