1986 AC Ace vs. 2009 Audi R8
To start off, 2009 Audi R8 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 AC Ace would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1986 AC Ace. (201 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1986 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 AC Ace weights approximately 125 kg more than 2009 Audi R8.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 AC Ace. (276 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1986 AC Ace | 2009 Audi R8 | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Ace | R8 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 4163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 276 Nm | 430 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 12.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 90 L |