1986 AC Ace vs. 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero
To start off, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 AC Ace would be higher. At 6,350 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero (1,269 HP @ 6075 RPM) has 1119 more horse power than 1986 AC Ace. (150 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero should accelerate faster than 1986 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero weights approximately 343 kg more than 1986 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 AC Ace is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 AC Ace will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 AC Ace | 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero | |
| Make | AC | SSC |
| Model | Ace | Ultimate Aero |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 6350 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 1269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6075 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 907 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1090 mm |
